This list is for the topics relating to quality assurance, including test suites, validation processes, and bug tracking. (date)

This list is for the topics relating to quality assurance, including test suites, validation processes, and bug tracking. (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

April 29, 2005

Re: ANN: JavaScript TestSimple 0.02, David Wheeler, 15:20
ANN: JavaScript TestSimple 0.03, David Wheeler, 15:15

April 28, 2005

Re: verbose diagnostics, Michael G Schwern, 22:51
Re: verbose diagnostics, James E Keenan, 22:08
Re: verbose diagnostics, Michael G Schwern, 15:35
Re: verbose diagnostics, Paul Johnson, 10:37
Re: verbose diagnostics, Fergal Daly, 10:09
Fwd: [agile-testing] ANNOUNCE: New version of Perl port of Fit., Adrian Howard, 09:57
Re: verbose diagnostics, Adrian Howard, 09:44
verbose diagnostics, Paul Johnson, 09:23

April 27, 2005

Re: Overriding Test::Builder::ok, Michael G Schwern, 20:15
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Test::Simple/More/Builder 0.59_01, Adrian Howard, 05:30
[ANNOUNCE] Test::Simple/More/Builder 0.59_01, Michael G Schwern, 01:03

April 25, 2005

Re: Test::Tutorial needs updated, Steve Peters, 20:05
Test::Tutorial needs updated, Michael G Schwern, 19:30

April 24, 2005

Re: is_deeply hangs, Michael G Schwern, 04:36

April 22, 2005

Fwd: CPAN Upload: P/PE/PETDANCE/Test-Harness-2.48.tar.gz, Andy Lester, 23:59

April 20, 2005

Re: Module and package version numbering, David Cantrell, 04:13

April 19, 2005

Re: Module and package version numbering, Adam Kennedy, 21:21
Re: Module and package version numbering, David Cantrell, 06:40

April 18, 2005

Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, David Wheeler, 21:05
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, David Wheeler, 20:51
Re: Module and package version numbering, Michael G Schwern, 17:16
Re: Module and package version numbering, David Wheeler, 17:00
Re: Module and package version numbering, Adrian Howard, 15:50
Re: Module and package version numbering, Rafael Garcia-Suarez, 15:44
Re: Module and package version numbering, Michael G Schwern, 15:11
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Adrian Howard, 12:15
Module and package version numbering, David Cantrell, 12:03
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Adrian Howard, 11:21
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, David Cantrell, 05:06

April 17, 2005

Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, Michael G Schwern, 20:05
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, David Wheeler, 19:26
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, Michael G Schwern, 18:12
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, jesse, 17:23
Re: Testing Ties, James E Keenan, 17:11
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, David Wheeler, 15:21
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, David A. Golden, 08:47
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Tony Bowden, 06:18
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Smylers, 04:24

April 16, 2005

Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, chromatic, 22:01
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, chromatic, 21:56
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Smylers, 20:21
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Smylers, 20:17
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Michael Graham, 19:31
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, Adam Kennedy, 17:53

April 15, 2005

Announcing Test::TAP::Model and Test::TAP::HTMLMatrix, Yuval Kogman, 20:20
Re: Test::Expect, Ricardo SIGNES, 08:06
Re: JavaScript TestSimple 0.02, David Wheeler, 01:35

April 14, 2005

Re: Test automation with perl., Adrian Howard, 15:45
Re: Test::Expect, Adrian Howard, 15:37
Re: Test automation with perl., Kevin Scaldeferri, 11:18
Test::Expect, Leon Brocard, 06:36
RE: Test automation with perl., Clayton, Nik, 04:54
Re: Test automation with perl., suresh babu, 03:43
Re: Net::SSLeay testing, Andy Lester, 00:00

April 13, 2005

Net::SSLeay testing, Walter Goulet, 23:42
Re: Testing for NULL return values in test scripts, Tels, 17:57
Re: Testing for NULL return values in test scripts, Michael G Schwern, 17:20
Re: Testing for NULL return values in test scripts, Walter Goulet, 16:52
Re: Test automation with perl., Michael G Schwern, 15:56
Re: Tests running Tests, Tim Bunce, 10:25
Re: Test automation with perl., Adrian Howard, 09:45
Test automation with perl., suresh babu, 04:27

April 12, 2005

Re: Testing Ties, James E Keenan, 19:24
Re: Testing Ties, Michael G Schwern, 19:11
Re: Testing Ties, James E Keenan, 19:09
Re: Testing Ties, Kevin Scaldeferri, 19:05
Testing Ties, James E Keenan, 18:58
Re: Testing for NULL return values in test scripts, Michael G Schwern, 18:00
Re: Testing for NULL return values in test scripts, Michael G Schwern, 17:41
Re: Testing for NULL return values in test scripts, Walter Goulet, 17:15
Re: Testing for NULL return values in test scripts, Tels, 16:57
Re: Testing for NULL return values in test scripts, Walter Goulet, 14:39
Re: Tests running Tests, Sam Tregar, 14:02
Re: Testing for NULL return values in test scripts, Steve Peters, 14:00
Testing for NULL return values in test scripts, Walter Goulet, 13:49
Re: Tests running Tests, Paul Johnson, 13:28
Tests running Tests, Sam Tregar, 13:20
Re: Phalanx kwiki, James E Keenan, 07:41

April 11, 2005

Phalanx kwiki, Walter Goulet, 22:40
Re: Difining an array, Michael G Schwern, 17:47
Re: Difining an array, Andy Lester, 11:12
Re: Difining an array, Philip M. Gollucci, 11:04
Difining an array, LOGGOS TI, 10:43

April 09, 2005

Re: best practices for returning a "technical failure" page to a web browser?, Andrew Pimlott, 16:52
Re: Probing requirements, Barbie, 06:22
Re: Probing requirements, Randy W. Sims, 01:59

April 08, 2005

Re: Probing requirements (was: Re: Some ideas), _brian_d_foy, 20:54
Probing requirements (was: Re: Some ideas), Randy W. Sims, 17:06
Re: How to force tests to issue "NA" reports?, Ken Williams, 15:02
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, David Wheeler, 14:03
Re: How to force tests to issue "NA" reports?, Michael G Schwern, 13:32
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, Michael G Schwern, 13:28
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Michael Graham, 13:22
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, David Wheeler, 13:12
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, David Wheeler, 13:05
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, Geoffrey Young, 12:36
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, Adrian Howard, 11:22
Re: How to force tests to issue "NA" reports?, David Cantrell, 10:52
RE: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Barbie, 07:43
RE: How to force tests to issue "NA" reports?, Barbie, 05:20
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Tony Bowden, 04:53

April 07, 2005

Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, David Wheeler, 21:03
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, Michael G Schwern, 20:55
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, David Wheeler, 19:17
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, David Wheeler, 19:10
Re: How to force tests to issue "NA" reports?, Michael G Schwern, 18:12
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, Michael G Schwern, 16:40
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, Ovid, 15:46
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, David Wheeler, 15:27
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, Fergal Daly, 15:19
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Pete Krawczyk, 15:06
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, David Wheeler, 14:47
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, David Wheeler, 14:32
Re: TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, Andy Lester, 14:28
TestSimple/More/Builder in JavaScript, David Wheeler, 14:23
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, chromatic, 13:35
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Christopher H. Laco, 13:22
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Tony Bowden, 13:11
Re: Why a scoreboard?, Ricardo SIGNES, 12:13
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Tony Bowden, 11:49
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, David Golden, 10:05
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Christopher H. Laco, 08:56
Re: Why a scoreboard?, Thomas Klausner, 05:46
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Thomas Klausner, 05:40

April 06, 2005

Re: Why a scoreboard?, Adam Kennedy, 23:29
How to force tests to issue "NA" reports?, Robert Rothenberg, 08:13

April 05, 2005

Re: examples of testing cookies with WWW::Mechanize ?, Mark Stosberg, 12:57
examples of testing cookies with WWW::Mechanize ?, Mark Stosberg, 12:22
Re: a less fragile way to test when we need to read and write to STDOUT?, Mark Stosberg, 09:09

April 04, 2005

Re: a less fragile way to test when we need to read and write to STDOUT?, Mark Stosberg, 21:26
Re: Testing Net-SSLeay, Tels, 12:13
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Thomas Klausner, 05:51
Re: Testing Net-SSLeay, David Cantrell, 05:32
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, David Cantrell, 05:13

April 03, 2005

Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Michael G Schwern, 22:45
Re: Why a scoreboard?, Greg Matheson, 20:26
Testing Book Reviewers Wanted!, chromatic, 20:02
Re: Why a scoreboard?, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes, 18:27
Re: Testing Net-SSLeay, Andrew Savige, 03:26
Re: Why a scoreboard?, Johan Vromans, 01:45

April 02, 2005

Re: Why a scoreboard?, Michael G Schwern, 17:45
Re: Bug in Net-SSLeay documentation, Walter Goulet, 10:56
Re: Why a scoreboard?, Ricardo SIGNES, 10:43
Re: Testing Net-SSLeay, Tels, 10:43
Re: Bug in Net-SSLeay documentation, Andy Lester, 10:12
Re: Why a scoreboard?, Smylers, 06:29
Re: Testing Net-SSLeay, Tels, 05:56
Re: Why a scoreboard?, Michael G Schwern, 03:39
Bug in Net-SSLeay documentation, Walter Goulet, 03:31
Re: Why a scoreboard?, Michael G Schwern, 01:27

April 01, 2005

Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni, 18:44
Re: [Module::Build] Re: Test::META, Ken Williams, 17:57
Re: Testing Net-SSLeay, Walter Goulet, 16:35
Why a scoreboard?, Andy Lester, 16:30
Re: Testing Net-SSLeay, Andy Lester, 16:26
Re: [Module::Build] Re: Test::META, Christopher H. Laco, 15:55
Re: [Module::Build] Re: Test::META, Ken Williams, 15:46
Re: [Module::Build] Re: Test::META, Ken Williams, 15:35
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Tony Bowden, 15:10
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, chromatic, 15:05
Testing Net-SSLeay, Walter Goulet, 14:47
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, Thomas Klausner, 14:00
Re: Kwalitee and has_test_*, chromatic, 13:59
Re: a less fragile way to test when we need to read and write toSTDOUT?, George Nistorica, 06:51