Parrot 0.6.2 "Reverse Sublimation" Released!, chromatic, 2008/05/20

• Re: Parrot 0.6.2 "Reverse Sublimation" Released!, François Perrad, 2008/05/22

Re: assignable mutators (S06/Lvalue subroutines), John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/16

• Re: assignable mutators (S06/Lvalue subroutines), TSa, 2008/05/26
  • Re: assignable mutators (S06/Lvalue subroutines), TSa, 2008/05/26
  • Re: assignable mutators (S06/Lvalue subroutines), Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH, 2008/05/26
    • Re: assignable mutators (S06/Lvalue subroutines), TSa, 2008/05/26
    • Re: assignable mutators (S06/Lvalue subroutines), Dave Whipp, 2008/05/27
    • Re: assignable mutators (S06/Lvalue subroutines), TSa, 2008/05/27
    • Re: assignable mutators (S06/Lvalue subroutines), Dave Whipp, 2008/05/27
    • Re: assignable mutators (S06/Lvalue subroutines), TSa, 2008/05/28

Private methods in classes and roles, Moritz Lenz, 2008/05/16

• Re: Private methods in classes and roles, Moritz Lenz, 2008/05/16
• Re: Private methods in classes and roles, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/16

parameters: ref vs rw, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/10

• Re: parameters: ref vs rw, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH, 2008/05/10
  • Re: parameters: ref vs rw, Larry Wall, 2008/05/10
  • Re: parameters: ref vs rw, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/10
• Message not available
  • Re: parameters: ref vs rw, TSa, 2008/05/28

Re: The Inf type, TSa, 2008/05/09

• Re: The Inf type, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/09

Compile-time checking of assignment to read-only variables (Re: MMD distances), Carl Mäsak, 2008/05/09

• Re: Compile-time checking of assignment to read-only variables (Re: MMD distances), Patrick R. Michaud, 2008/05/09
  • Re: Compile-time checking of assignment to read-only variables (Re: MMD distances), Carl Mäsak, 2008/05/09
    • Re: Compile-time checking of assignment to read-only variables (Re: MMD distances), Patrick R. Michaud, 2008/05/09
    • Re: Compile-time checking of assignment to read-only variables (Re: MMD distances), Carl Mäsak, 2008/05/10
    • Re: Compile-time checking of assignment to read-only variables, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/10
    • Re: Compile-time checking of assignment to read-only variables (Re: MMD distances), John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/09
    • Re: Compile-time checking of assignment to read-only variables (Re:MMD distances), Me Here, 2008/05/15
    • Re: Compile-time checking of assignment to read-only variables (Re:MMD distances), Carl Mäsak, 2008/05/15
    • Message not available
    • Re: Compile-time checking of assignment to read-only variables (Re:MMD distances), Carl Mäsak, 2008/05/17
    • Re: Compile-time checking of assignment to read-only variables (Re:MMD distances), Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH, 2008/05/17
    • Re: Compile-time checking of assignment to read-only variables (Re:MMD distances), Me Here, 2008/05/17
    • Re: Compile-time checking of assignment to read-only variables (Re:MMD distances), Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH, 2008/05/15

my TypeName $x;, Jonathan Worthington, 2008/05/06

• Re: my TypeName $x;, Jon Lang, 2008/05/06
  • Re: my TypeName $x;, Jon Lang, 2008/05/06
    • Re: my TypeName $x;, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH, 2008/05/06
  • Re: my TypeName $x;, TSa, 2008/05/06
    • Re: my TypeName $x;, Jon Lang, 2008/05/06
• Re: my TypeName $x;, Larry Wall, 2008/05/06
  • Re: my TypeName $x;, Jon Lang, 2008/05/06
    • Re: my TypeName $x;, Larry Wall, 2008/05/06
    • Re: my TypeName $x;, Jon Lang, 2008/05/07
    • Re: my TypeName $x;, TSa, 2008/05/08
    • Re: my TypeName $x;, TSa, 2008/05/09

Re: New specdoc available, TSa, 2008/05/05

• Re: New specdoc available, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/05

not a reference - What does this mean?, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/04

• Re: not a reference - What does this mean?, Jonathan Worthington, 2008/05/04

Where is "Manhattan Dispatch" discussion?, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/04

• Re: Where is "Manhattan Dispatch" discussion?, Ovid, 2008/05/06
  • Re: Where is "Manhattan Dispatch" discussion?, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/06
    • Re: Where is "Manhattan Dispatch" discussion?, Carl Mäsak, 2008/05/06
    • Re: Where is "Manhattan Dispatch" discussion?, Mark A. Biggar, 2008/05/06
    • Re: Where is "Manhattan Dispatch" discussion?, TSa, 2008/05/06
    • MMD thoughts 2008, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/06
    • Re: MMD thoughts 2008, TSa, 2008/05/06
    • Re: MMD thoughts 2008, Buddha Buck, 2008/05/06
    • Re: MMD thoughts 2008, TSa, 2008/05/07
    • Minimal Distance (Re: Where is "Manhattan Dispatch" discussion?), John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/06
    • Re: Minimal Distance (Re: Where is "Manhattan Dispatch" discussion?), TSa, 2008/05/06
    • Re: Minimal Distance (Re: Where is "Manhattan Dispatch" discussion?), Larry Wall, 2008/05/06
    • Re: Minimal Distance (Re: Where is "Manhattan Dispatch" discussion?), John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/06
    • Re: Minimal Distance (Re: Where is "Manhattan Dispatch" discussion?), Larry Wall, 2008/05/06
    • Re: Minimal Distance (Re: Where is "Manhattan Dispatch" discussion?), TSa, 2008/05/07
    • Re: Minimal Distance (Re: Where is "Manhattan Dispatch" discussion?), Austin Hastings, 2008/05/07
    • Re: Minimal Distance (Re: Where is "Manhattan Dispatch" discussion?), Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH, 2008/05/07
    • [English] what is a flack? (Re: Minimal Distance), John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/08
    • Re: [English] what is a flack? (Re: Minimal Distance), Mark J. Reed, 2008/05/08
    • Message not available
    • Re: MMD distances, TSa, 2008/05/08
    • Re: MMD distances, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/08
    • Re: MMD distances, TSa, 2008/05/09
    • Re: Minimal Distance (Re: Where is "Manhattan Dispatch" discussion?), John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/06

Re: grammar for 'constant' ?, Moritz Lenz, 2008/05/04

• Re: grammar for 'constant' ?, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/04

nested 'our' subs - senseless?, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/03

• Re: nested 'our' subs - senseless?, TSa, 2008/05/05
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: nested 'our' subs - senseless?, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/05
• Message not available
  • Re: nested 'our' subs - senseless?, TSa, 2008/05/06
    • Re: nested 'our' subs - senseless?, David Green, 2008/05/06

Re: What does 'eqv' do exactly?, Jon Lang, 2008/05/03

• Re: What does 'eqv' do exactly?, Jon Lang, 2008/05/03
  • Message not available
    • Re: What does 'eqv' do exactly?, David Green, 2008/05/03
  • Message not available
    • Re: What does 'eqv' do exactly?, TSa, 2008/05/05
• Re: What does 'eqv' do exactly?, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/03

Re: Polymorphism and Representations, TSa, 2008/05/02

• Re: Polymorphism and Representations, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/02
  • Re: Polymorphism and Representations, TSa, 2008/05/02
    • Re: Polymorphism and Representations, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/02
    • Re: Polymorphism and Representations, TSa, 2008/05/02

Re: treatment of "isa" and inheritance, TSa, 2008/05/02

• Re: treatment of "isa" and inheritance, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/02
  • Re: treatment of "isa" and inheritance, Jon Lang, 2008/05/02
    • Re: treatment of "isa" and inheritance, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/02
    • Re: treatment of "isa" and inheritance, Jon Lang, 2008/05/02
• Re: treatment of "isa" and inheritance, TSa, 2008/05/02
  • Message not available
    • Re: treatment of "isa" and inheritance, TSa, 2008/05/02
  • Re: treatment of "isa" and inheritance, Dr.Ruud, 2008/05/02
• Re: treatment of "isa" and inheritance, Ovid, 2008/05/02
• Re: treatment of "isa" and inheritance, Daniel Ruoso, 2008/05/02
  • Message not available
    • Re: treatment of "isa" and inheritance, Daniel Ruoso, 2008/05/02

Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, chromatic, 2008/05/01

• Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH, 2008/05/01
  • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, Jon Lang, 2008/05/01
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH, 2008/05/01
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, Larry Wall, 2008/05/01
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH, 2008/05/01
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, Dave Whipp, 2008/05/01
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, Larry Wall, 2008/05/01
  • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, chromatic, 2008/05/01
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, Ovid, 2008/05/02
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/02
• Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/01
  • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, chromatic, 2008/05/02
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, TSa, 2008/05/02
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, Larry Wall, 2008/05/02
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/02
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, Larry Wall, 2008/05/02
    • Message not available
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, TSa, 2008/05/02
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, Daniel Ruoso, 2008/05/02
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, TSa, 2008/05/02
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/02
  • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, Ovid, 2008/05/02
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, TSa, 2008/05/02
    • Message not available
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, TSa, 2008/05/02
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, TSa, 2008/05/02
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/02
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, Daniel Ruoso, 2008/05/02
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/02
    • Message not available
    • Re: "All classes imply the existence of a role of the same name.", John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/02
    • Message not available
    • Re: "All classes imply the existence of a role of the same name.", Larry Wall, 2008/05/02
    • Re: "All classes imply the existence of a role of the same name.", Austin Hastings, 2008/05/02
    • Message not available
    • Re: "All classes imply the existence of a role of the same name.", John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/02
    • Message not available
    • Re: "All classes imply the existence of a role of the same name.", Nicholas Clark, 2008/05/07
    • Re: "All classes imply the existence of a role of the same name.", TSa, 2008/05/08
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: "All classes imply the existence of a role of the same name.", John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/16
    • RE: "All classes imply the existence of a role of the same name.", Kealey, Martin, ihug-NZ, 2008/05/16
    • Message not available
    • Re: "All classes imply the existence of a role of the same name.", Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH, 2008/05/03
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/02
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, chromatic, 2008/05/02
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, Larry Wall, 2008/05/02
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, chromatic, 2008/05/02
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/02
• Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, mark . a . biggar, 2008/05/01
• Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/02
• Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/02
  • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, Jonathan Worthington, 2008/05/02
    • Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/02

Re: OK, ::?CLASS not virtual, Jon Lang, 2008/05/01

• Re: OK, ::?CLASS not virtual, John M. Dlugosz, 2008/05/01
• Re: OK, ::?CLASS not virtual, TSa, 2008/05/02