[% setvar title Keep default Perl free of constraints such as warnings and strict. %]

This file is part of the Perl 6 Archive

To see what is currently happening visit http://www.perl6.org/

TITLE

Keep default Perl free of constraints such as warnings and strict.

VERSION

  Maintainer: Daniel Chetlin <daniel@chetlin.com>
  Date: 3 Aug 2000
  Last Modified: 28 Sep 2000
  Mailing List: perl6-language-strict@perl.org
  Number: 16
  Version: 3
  Status: Frozen

ABSTRACT

Perl5 is usable with no hassle as a quick-and-dirty problem-solver by default. It is ideal for one-liners, short scripts, and quick hacks that have no need for extra protection or error-checking. It is also great for large projects by making use of the warnings and strict pragmas.

Perl6 should not make the one-liners, short scripts and hacks need to jump through extra hoops to get the "lax" behaviour which is default in Perl5; the point of using Perl as a quick-and-dirty tool is that you don't have to do anything extra.

CHANGES

This RFC, along with RFC 6, sparked a fair amount of discussion on perl6-language-strict over a month ago. Since then, traffic on -strict has died down, and nothing new has really been brought to the table that would affect this RFC.

The only major change to the text of this RFC was to remove a paragraph stating that this RFC is particularly targeted to keep strict 'vars' off by default. This paragraph stated that instead of making that change, the problem with dynamic variables being default be fixed. It has been removed for two reasons:

While an RFC discussing/debating/expanding on any of RFCs 6, 64, and 106 might be useful, this RFC is expressly not such a document.

In terms of changes to the real focus of this RFC, there has been little progress made. The camps are fairly significantly divided between those who want to make warnings and strict the default for ease of learning and debugging Perl as well as deploying it for large projects, and those who want to keep quick, dirty, and easy from becoming harder. Since the author does not forsee much progress in this disagreement, this RFC is in a just-pre-frozen state, and is expected to be frozen within a few days.

DESCRIPTION

Perl provides two main ways to ensure "safer", cleaner, more maintainable code: the -w switch/warnings pragma and the strict pragma. It appears likely that Perl6 will improve upon, expand, or add to this area. Extra functionality and power for these pragmas as well as additional pragmas (such as the stricter pragma mentioned at TPC) seem to be a good thing, but none should become default for Perl.

In large projects which require the constraining pragmas, it is not an issue to take the extra steps and 'use' them. But in quick solutions and one-liners, it is a major drawback to have to add no strict or -M-strict for every quick hack or one-liner that would violate the strict pragma. Some have suggested a shortcut command-line switch that would disable the constraining pragmas, and others have suggested that one-liners be exempt from the default. Both of these solutions would make things somewhat better, but it still does not fit what seems to have been the philosophy of Perl from day 1: be _lax_ by default, and allow constrictions to be added by hand.

Perl6 is intended to make the easy things easier and the hard things possible, just like Perl5 only moreso. While making the constraining pragmas the default might make hard things very slightly more possible, it would also make lots of easy things harder, and that is something to avoid at all costs.

IMPLEMENTATION

There should be no implementation issues.

REFERENCES

perlrun(1)

strict(3)