[% setvar title rindex and index should return true/false values %]
To see what is currently happening visit http://www.perl6.org/
rindex and index should return true/false values
Maintainer: Nathan Torkington <gnat@frii.com> Date: 12 Sep 2000 Last Modified: 15 Sep 2000 Mailing List: perl6-language@perl.org Number: 213 Version: 2 Status: Developing
index() and rindex() should return undef if their
second argument is not a substring of their first
argument. If the substring occurs at the start of
the first argument, they should return "0 but true".
* added "0 but true" suggestion
In perl5, index() and rindex() return -1 if the
substring isn't found. This seems out of step with
the rest of Perl's functions, which return undef
on error. I propose changing index() and rindex()
to return undef if the substring isn't found.
This would also cause warnings to be issued when programmers use the results of index() or rindex() assuming the substring was found.
This suggestion doesn't rely on RFC 53, "Built-ins: Merge and
generalize index and rindex", and works regardless
of whether 53 is accepted or not.
When the substring occurs at the start of the larger string, the functions should return "0 but true". This is exempt from "isn't numeric" warnings, and gives them useful boolean return values:
if (index($big_string, $little_string)) {
print "$little_string is in $big_string";
}
without breaking their existing numeric uses.
The perl526 translator could turn index($a,$b) calls into
do { my $tmp = index($a,$b);
if (defined($tmp)) { 0 + $tmp }
else { -1 }
}
RFC 53: Built-ins: Merge and generalize index and rindex
perlfunc manpage for information on index() and rindex()